Ok
My understanding is that for UL grants UE need to send Scheduling Request.
For DL grants itâs by eNodeB if there is data for particular user.
Ok
My understanding is that for UL grants UE need to send Scheduling Request.
For DL grants itâs by eNodeB if there is data for particular user.
Canât find UE inactivity timer in UE logs, not even in 5G ones.
Isnât this just for NR SA?
No itâs for LTE also.
OEM should develop and implement it.
Itâs not mandatory thing.
Yes i am talking about this only.
I wrongly name it as UE inactivity timer, itâs data inactivity timer introduced in rel-14.
Thank you for this post!
There is an observation where in S1 it is seen UEContextReleaseRequest with cause user-inactivityâŚ
But in parallel the user is undergoing a process of establishing SIP call so in theory the chances that there is no scheduling in UL/DL at that moment are zero but in practice we have such user-inactivity reporting.
Does anyone have an answer why do we have âuser-inactivityâ in such case?
And Yes it is true that only DL resources are released only. Surprisingly UL is kept by keeping all resources around (GTP, Gx, Rx, Diameter) .
Thank you!
HiâŚwere you able to find out the reason behind that ? We are experiencing the same in our network. The SIP call establishment is in progress, PRACK and 200OK is released and then suddenly UEContextReleaseRequest with cause user-inactivity is send from eNodeB to MME. In various traces, the value of this was different, sometimes 13 secs other times 19 seconds. This does not match the inactivity timer that we have ( 6 secs).