@Cesar_Nunes i think this problem might differ. other’s have found it when they have handover issues. For me, it was caused by a time delay from core network but you can only know for sure by analyzing your trace or enodeB CHR files.
rizwankader
22
In my case, lots of cells were impacted suddenly by L.E-RAB.FailEst.MME and ERAB setup success rate was hugely impacted. Then I check and found that TNL drop was also very high for those sites from same instance. So, escalated to the Tx team and found out that the Tx utilization on that Tx hub became 95%. After traffic shifting, issue was solved.
2 Likes
Related Topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LTE UE context failures | 41 | 8178 | April 15, 2024 | |
LTE E-RAB Failures due to MME | 6 | 957 | April 25, 2024 | |
Improve LTE QCI-6/9 eRAB Setup Success rate and eRAB Drop Rate for data users | 6 | 1041 | April 27, 2023 | |
S1 Handover Preparation Failure | 8 | 918 | April 24, 2024 | |
VoLTE Access failure | 4 | 2075 | March 30, 2021 | |
How to improve the "L.E-RAB.FailEst.SecurModeFail"? | 5 | 913 | March 27, 2024 | |
What are the possible reasons for low E-RAB success ratio if E-UTRAN has no issues? | 8 | 5204 | November 22, 2021 | |
S1 Signaling Success Rate issue in a few cells only | 13 | 1015 | February 5, 2024 | |
HandoverPreparationFailure [RadioNetwork-cause=interaction-with-other-procedure] | 10 | 1549 | March 28, 2022 | |
eRAB fail in one cell due to MME Packet loss in GBR | 13 | 2371 | May 24, 2023 |