CS Fallback: A Transition Between Generations of Mobile Networks

4G LTE
, , ,
1

image
image1597×907 231 KB

Abstract

CS Fallback was introduced as a temporary solution to support voice calls on LTE networks, a technology designed solely for data transmission. This article explores its technical functioning, the historical context of its implementation, associated challenges, and its evolution to the present, where VoLTE and the decommissioning of legacy networks have reshaped the landscape.

1. Introduction

The introduction of LTE brought opportunities for high-speed data transmission. However, LTE is entirely packet-switched (PS), lacking native support for voice, which historically depended on circuit-switching (CS). The solution was Circuit-Switched Fallback (CSFB), enabling LTE devices to use legacy networks (3G or 2G) to make voice calls.

2. What is CS Fallback?

CS Fallback is an interoperability mechanism that temporarily redirects LTE devices to legacy networks capable of handling voice calls via circuit switching. It was vital in LTE’s early years to ensure compatibility before the widespread adoption of VoLTE (Voice over LTE).

3. Why Was CS Fallback Necessary?

When LTE launched (2009–2014), it lacked native support for voice calls due to several factors:

  • Data-focused development: LTE’s primary goal was enhanced data rates.
  • Immature IMS infrastructure: The IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS), crucial for VoLTE, was in early stages of deployment.
  • Device limitations: Early devices were not VoLTE-compatible.
  • Cost considerations: CS Fallback leveraged existing infrastructure, reducing immediate investment needs.

4. How Does CS Fallback Work?

The CS Fallback mechanism follows structured steps to enable voice calls:

4.1. Call Setup

  1. The device initiates a voice call while registered on the LTE network.
  2. The LTE base station (eNodeB) notifies the MME (Mobility Management Entity) of the voice request.
  3. The MME communicates with the MSC (Mobile Switching Center) of the legacy network via the SGs interface to trigger the fallback.

4.2. Handover to Legacy Networks

  • Network Selection: The device switches to the available WCDMA or GSM network.
  • Technical Transition:
    • Frequency-based handover (e.g., 850 MHz or 2100 MHz).
    • Technology-based handover (prioritizing 2G or 3G based on configuration).
  • Connection Setup: The MSC completes the process and establishes the call.

4.3. Return to LTE

After the call ends, the device either returns to LTE or remains on the legacy network, depending on signal quality and operator settings.

5. Use and Decline of CS Fallback

5.1. Early LTE Deployment

  • Total Dependence: Initially, almost all LTE voice calls relied on CSFB.
  • Legacy Networks: GSM and WCDMA were widely available, supporting fallback functionality.

5.2. Declining Usage

From 2015 onward, CSFB reliance waned due to:

  • VoLTE Adoption: With better device support and IMS infrastructure.
  • Legacy Network Shutdowns:
    • GSM: Phased out in many regions (e.g., AT&T in 2017, T-Mobile in 2020).
    • WCDMA: Spectrum (e.g., 2100 MHz) reallocated for LTE or 5G.

6. Advantages and Challenges of CS Fallback

6.1. Advantages

  • Compatibility: Ensured LTE could coexist with legacy networks.
  • Cost Savings: Minimized immediate investments before VoLTE adoption.

6.2. Challenges

  • Connection Delays: Handover introduces noticeable latency.
  • Service Quality: Reliance on legacy networks prone to congestion or poor coverage.
  • Battery Drain: Network transitions increase energy consumption.

7. Current Status and Future Outlook

7.1. Residual Usage

  • Rural areas and smaller operators still use CSFB.
  • Developing regions face VoLTE implementation barriers.

7.2. Future Directions

  • Gradual Phase-Out: CSFB will become obsolete with GSM and WCDMA shutdowns.
  • Rise of VoNR (Voice over New Radio): Native 5G voice calls will eliminate the need for legacy fallback.

8. Conclusion

CS Fallback played a critical role in the LTE transition, ensuring interoperability during its initial implementation. However, with VoLTE’s advancements and mobile network modernization, its usage has significantly decreased. The future envisions a fully IP-based environment, with VoNR leading the next phase of telecommunications evolution.

References

  1. 3GPP TS 23.272 – Circuit Switched Fallback in Evolved Packet System.
  2. GSMA – VoLTE Deployment Trends https://www.gsma.com/volte-trends.
  3. Qualcomm Insights – Transition to VoLTE https://www.qualcomm.com/volte.
  4. AT&T Newsroom – 2G Network Sunset https://www.att.com/2g-sunset.
  5. Ericsson Mobility Report – Evolution of LTE https://www.ericsson.com/mobility.

LinkedIn (in Portuguese): :point_down: