Is Mioty The Next Leap In LPWAN Technology?

Mioty is a software based LPWAN protocol designed to tackle the challenges of today’s wireless connectivity. Its design is driven by the mioty Alliance, which is backed by companies like Diehl Metering, Fraunhofer, Texas Instruments, LORIOT, ST Microelectronics, Olympus and more.

The alliance site explains that mioty is built for massive industrial and commercial IoT deployments, offering best-in-class reliability and scalability.

If you are familiar with LoRaWAN, you’ll see a certain resemblance: their architectures consist in low power devices connecting through distant gateways (or base stations), themselves managed by a Network server (or Service Center) which exposes devices and their data securely to applications through an Application Server (or Application Center).

And if you come to think about it, other LPWAN technologies like NB-IoT or LTE-M do propose similar architectures as well. The difference lies in the modulation of the signal between the device and the Gateway or Base Station. There are different types of modulation each designed to address different scenarios.

So many LPWAN technologies… but why?

Continue reading to learn: :point_down:

In this infograph Furqan Jameel compares NB IoT vs MIoTY.

𝗜𝘀 𝗠𝗜𝗼𝗧𝗬 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗡𝗕-𝗜𝗼𝗧…?

Well, it depends on your IoT application.

First, let’s dispel a common misconception.

MIoTY and NB-IoT are different technologies.

MIoTY and NB-IoT serve different purposes.
MIoTY and NB-IoT have distinct features.
MIoTY and NB-IoT offer unique benefits.

Here are key differences.

Mioty suits real-time applications.
NB-IoT is better for bulk data.

Mioty excels in rural and expansive areas.
NB-IoT shines in urban, indoor settings.

Mioty is ideal for spread-out networks.
NB-IoT suits denser deployments.

Mioty is often deployed on private networks.
NB-IoT benefits from cellular networks.

Both Mioty and NB-IoT are IoT frontrunners.

Each technology shines in its own way.

There’s no clear-cut winner in this race.

Ultimately, the victor is determined by your specific IoT application requirements

Source (and credits): :point_down: