Understanding the significance of prompt engineering is crucial in optimizing AI usage, specifically in Generative AI. Let’s delve into how this expertise can lead to reduced model consumption expenses through a comparative analysis between individuals with and without prompt engineering knowledge.
Person A (Unfamiliar with Prompt Engineering):
When asking a broad question like “Tell me about AI in healthcare,” the response tends to be lengthy and covers various aspects such as AI applications in hospitals, research, and diagnosis. This generalized approach consumes a significant number of tokens, resulting in higher expenses.
- Token Consumption:
- Input: ~7 tokens
- Output: ~500 tokens (comprehensive but unfocused)
- Total: 507 tokens
- Cost: $0.0151
Person B (Proficient in Prompt Engineering):
In contrast, an individual well-versed in prompt engineering structures inquiries clearly for precise responses. For instance, asking to “Summarize the top 3 applications of AI in healthcare, with real-world examples, in under 100 words” leads to a concise and focused answer.
- Token Consumption:
- Input: ~22 tokens
- Output: ~100 tokens (clear and concise)
- Total: 122 tokens
- Cost: $0.00322
Cost Comparison:
Considering GPT-4 Turbo pricing:
- Input: $0.01 per 1,000 tokens
- Output: $0.03 per 1,000 tokens
Conclusion:
Person B, equipped with prompt engineering skills, experiences substantial savings:
- Tokens saved: 385
- Cost reduction: 79% cheaper
By emphasizing prompt engineering, individuals can efficiently utilize Generative AI while significantly cutting down on model consumption expenses.
LinkedIn: 