Hi friends.
As mentioned SRB used to transfer RRC and NAS message.
I have 1 doubt: why SRB 1 used for RRC connection reconfiguration message transfer?
Why not SRB 2?
As I can see content of RRC connection reconfiguration having SRB 2 IE definition.
ankgitm
1
admin
Split this topic
2
3 posts were merged into an existing topic: Why SRB2 if SRB1 itself is capable of transfering NAS messages?
Related Topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Why SRB2 if SRB1 itself is capable of transfering NAS messages? | 16 | 1721 | June 19, 2021 | |
| Why SRB2 has lower priority then SRB1? | 3 | 635 | March 29, 2022 | |
| During attach RRC connection reconfiguration message, is it on SRB1 or SRB2? | 1 | 190 | August 16, 2023 | |
| Srb0 in RRC connection request and RRC connection setup | 14 | 3649 | March 13, 2021 | |
| Which message is responsible to provide the config of srb0? | 1 | 417 | July 22, 2022 | |
| Why SRB3 cannot be used in NE-DC? | 9 | 1156 | November 16, 2021 | |
| Does HARQ use Chase or Incremental Combining in MAC layer during RLC ACK/NACK? | 14 | 1104 | March 25, 2022 | |
| Enable SRB3 from network side | 2 | 1027 | March 17, 2022 | |
| SRBs Definition | 0 | 424 | January 22, 2023 | |
| 5G RRC Connection (Signalling Radio Bearer: SRB) | 1 | 1721 | July 23, 2024 |